Skip to main content

Wonga and the Archbishop.

The Archbishop’s embarrassment concerning the Church Commissioner’s investment indirectly in Wonga helps to clarify ideas about sin, purity and holiness. In particular it reveals the extent to which sin is communal and interconnected. The Archbishop talks about a complex world which we all have to live in. He is right, but it can be put more theologically than that. The in-depth discussion around the Charity Commissioner’s investment portfolio and its tolerance of say up to 3% in companies (perhaps a hotel chain) that sell pornography reveals the way in which it is probably impossible to exist in perfect holy isolation. Nobody is perfect in and of themselves because we exist inter-dependently of one another. That is why sin is so corrupting - the wide effect of the pornographic industry not just on those who make it and buy it can be charted. That is why, when God made Himself known to the Jewish people as YHWH, that he started a covenantal relationship not just with a few individuals but with a community. Moreover that is why to speak of individual salvation is to entirely misunderstand the nature of human existence. How can one individual be saved in isolation if we are so interconnected that none can be innocent or entirely free from sin?

When we consider the search and desire for holiness in Christianity monastic living shines out as being a way of life that accords most particularly with Christian values. People set themselves apart and promise to live lives of holiness, chastity, obedience, poverty and charity for example. Their witness reveals the degree to which Christianity requires self-sacrifice and it is the sort of witness that society is hungry for. John Humphry expresses this in his interview with the Archbishop when he suggests that the church has to offer, does it not, the perfect moral standard?

Not to let the church off the hook, nor to avoid difficult questions around investment portfolios and capitalism, but living in and of the world, as the Archbishop articulates means living with the reality of day to day sin both personal and communal. Christians can act as salt and light if they do identify and name sin whilst at the same time being humble enough to recognise their own contribution to it. In that way, maybe we can start to reform society, with others, not in holy isolation. We can remind one another that every single individual action that we take has a profound effect on our neighbour. How do we love our neighbour? By recognising our interconnectedness to them and putting our neighbour’s well-being at the core of how we act and behave. For even a monastic community in accepting a donation from a stranger may be the 'innocent' receiver of dirty money.

Popular posts from this blog

Radical Story-telling?

Public Domain   The Flight into Egypt  File: Adam Elsheimer - Die Flucht nach Ägypten (Alte Pinakothek) 2.jpg Created: 31 December 1608 Which of the Gospel writers include an account of the birth of Jesus? When were they writing, for what audience? Mark’s Gospel is almost universally considered to be the earliest Gospel and it’s understood that both Matthew and Luke used it as a source text. But Mark has no account of the birth of Jesus, he begins with John the Baptist and Jesus’ baptism. Only Matthew and Luke have birth narratives and they are different whilst sharing some common features: Mary and Joseph are to be married and there’s a miraculous virgin birth in Bethlehem. But that’s about it. Jesus is born in a house in Matthew’s account whilst he is placed in a manger in Luke’s because there’s ‘no room at the inn’. Mary’s thoughts and feelings are not mentioned in Matthew at all, whilst from Luke we get the story of the Visitation, Annunciation and the wonderfu...
2 comments
Read more

Identity, belonging and holiness

Sermon for 2nd July Doubting Thomas - Ephesians 2:19-end, John 20:24-29 In Paul’s letter to the Ephesians we see classic Pauline theology in action – Paul is explaining to the Ephesians (Gentiles) that they are fully accepted into the household of God and full members of it. The implication is that they are unsure about their place. Paul is clear that their tradition and history is rooted now not only in the Patriarchs, but also in the Apostles and with Jesus Christ as the corner stone. It is the Apostles in Jesus who invite them to full membership. No longer is holiness and worship centred on the Temple in Jerusalem but, rather, the individual believers are spiritual temples and the group of believers an ‘habitation of God’. Paul, as we know, had been fully committed to his identity as a God-fearing Jew; his life and ritual practice confirmed his sense of superior identity before God. He was saved because of his birth right and due to his strict adherence to the Law. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more