Skip to main content

Looking at the Son


           

You may have noticed people wearing dark glasses in the news recently. They were attempting of course to look at the sun. The great shining light bulb in the sky that we long for and hide from in equal measure. They were waiting for the solar eclipse, when the sun was only visible by its outer rays – when darkness and cold descended during the day. A natural phenomenon that reminds us that we are dependent upon the movement of our planet and the position of the sun and moon for our experience of light and dark, for our experience of time.

It was for some a religious experience: an experience of transcendence that reminds us of our dependence upon the created universe. People were awed, shocked, could only exclaim: ‘Oh, my God!’.

I’ve been to France for my holidays and whilst there we visited the Bayeux Tapestry. In the tapestry, you can see a drawing of Halley’s comet. It was read as a harbinger of defeat for the upstart Harry. A sign of his infidelity. An omen for the people.

File:Bayeux Tapestry 32-33 comet Halley Harold.jpg
The Bayeux Tapestry, Halley's Comet, 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bayeux_Tapestry_32-33_comet_Halley_Harold.jpg


The similarity between these two events, and the great chasm of time between them struck me. It made me think about how we read our times – and how we make judgements about light and dark, truth and lies, about the actions of those in authority. Harry had been sent to Normandy by King Edward to tell William that he was the rightful heir to the English throne. On his death however, Harold had been crowned King. William, commanding an army sails to England to challenge Harold and claim the throne. William wins and is crowned King. The tapestry tells the tale and sets it within its wider astrological context.

Today, we continue to live our lives within the context of those who fight for, win and lose power over us. Except it’s worked out through the ballot box rather than the battle field; is re-set as a political question and answer, through the arrows of twitter and the duals of televised political debates.  Like those who lived in Normandy and England before us we must learn to discern the truth from the lies, the betrayers from the faithful.

For Christians, finding out what is the will of God is inseparable from recognizing Jesus as Lord. Jesus is effusive when Peter says that he is the Messiah the Son of God: ‘Blessed are you Simon, Son of Jonah…. You are Peter and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it’.

Today, as in every age, we must hang onto Jesus if we are to separate the light from the dark, the truth from the lies. And it is Jesus’ character revealed in his actions that testify that he is the Son of God. His qualities should guide us as we assess and judge the world around us: humble, compassionate, peacemaker, breaker down of boundaries, challenger of the powerful, guardian of the poor and vulnerable, host for the outcast. As Christians we have a certain and clear moral compass and a faithful and true leader whom we follow. The Word of God and the power of God can be manipulated and used in all sorts of ways, to justify all sorts of appalling actions. The faithful and true will be proven by their works. If we keep looking to Jesus, we will be exposed to the greatest light that there ever was and is.

As Christians we keep on looking at the Son – and we don’t need dark glasses. He shines out for us for ever and ever, only once eclipsed by those who could not bear his light, only to rise again more glorious than ever.

Bible References: 
Romans 12:1-8
Matthew 16:13-20













Comments

Post a Comment

Please be respectful when posting comments

Popular posts from this blog

Radical Story-telling?

Public Domain   The Flight into Egypt  File: Adam Elsheimer - Die Flucht nach Ägypten (Alte Pinakothek) 2.jpg Created: 31 December 1608 Which of the Gospel writers include an account of the birth of Jesus? When were they writing, for what audience? Mark’s Gospel is almost universally considered to be the earliest Gospel and it’s understood that both Matthew and Luke used it as a source text. But Mark has no account of the birth of Jesus, he begins with John the Baptist and Jesus’ baptism. Only Matthew and Luke have birth narratives and they are different whilst sharing some common features: Mary and Joseph are to be married and there’s a miraculous virgin birth in Bethlehem. But that’s about it. Jesus is born in a house in Matthew’s account whilst he is placed in a manger in Luke’s because there’s ‘no room at the inn’. Mary’s thoughts and feelings are not mentioned in Matthew at all, whilst from Luke we get the story of the Visitation, Annunciation and the wonderful radical
2 comments
Read more

Silence

Lent Study Group One of my top 10 books of the last 10 years has to be: 'A Book of Silence' by Sara Maitland. I first heard Sara talk at Greenbelt many years ago and I was fascinated then by who she was - an eccentric woman, speaking with intensity and insight, offering an alternative and captivating viewpoint on the human experience. In this book she explores silence in all sorts of ways: by living on her own; by visiting the desert; through analysing the desert traditions within early Christianity; and through attending to what happens to the body and the mind in and through extended silence and isolation. Her book begins: I am sitting on the front doorstep of my little house with a cup of coffee, looking down the valley at my extraordinary view of nothing. It is wonderful. Virginia Woolf famously taught us that every woman writer needs a room of her own. She didn't know the half of it, in my opinion. I need a moor of my own. Or, as an exasperated but obvious
1 comment
Read more

'I know why the caged bird sings'

When I was studying festivals and rituals in Renaissance Venice as a post-graduate, evocative paintings full of religious processions and miracles, one thing that struck me was how the public space was highly ritualised and controlled. Most of the time women were prevented from taking part in the public rituals and had to watch from their windows (see above). When they were out in public space, their appearance was strictly controlled.  'Being part of the governing structure of Venetian life, civic ritual was a male domain. A woman’s world was a distinctly smaller one than a man’s, while men made forays into the political and economic centres of the Piazza San Marco, the Rialto and further a field to the East in merchant galleys and the terraferma , women remained in small communities at home. Dennis Romano argues that a woman’s neighbourhood was the parish of her residence and perhaps one or two adjoining parishes, adding further that ‘generally speaking, men did not want t
Post a Comment
Read more