Skip to main content

Defiant Women

Women in Kabul, Afghanistan

I would like to begin by telling you the story of an Afghan teenage girl called Rahila Muska, which I read in Mark Oakley’s book A Splash of Poetry

Her story starts with a poem -a form of Afghan poetry called ‘Landay’.  Landay is an ancient, anonymous and oral form of folk poetry, written in couplets, mainly by and for illiterate Pashtun women on the Afghanistan and Pakistan border. 

This is the Landay that starts our story:

I call. You’re stone.
One day you’ll look and find I’m gone.

Rahila, the heroine of our story, lived in Helmand, a Taliban stronghold. Her father had taken her out of school for fear of the Taliban, as they saw the education of women as dishonourable; and it left her vulnerable to attack- kidnap or rape. Rahila found some consolation in poetry; Rahila loved Landay and she was a frequent caller to a radio programme, a chatline run by a women’s literary group, to which women would call and share their experiences and most of all Landay poetry.

One day in Spring 2010 Rahila called the programme from a hospital bed to say that she’d set herself on fire. Her brothers had beaten her after discovering that she wrote poetry. To many Afghans poetry is forbidden for women because it implies a freedom of will and her brothers were brutal in punishing her.

Rahila, with all her resilience and strength, set herself on fire. Soon after her phone call on the radio she died.

I call. You’re stone.
One day you’ll look and find I’m gone.

There seem to be connections between this story and the healing story in our Gospel today (Mark 7:24-30). The Greek Syrophoenician woman comes to beg healing from Jesus. Tyre, where the woman was from, was a predominantly non-Jewish region and here she is a gentile, a woman, risking everything to ask for healing for her daughter from a Jewish holy man. Jesus’ response to her implies the superiority of Israel’s claim upon God’s blessing, over that of the Gentiles. Worse, Jesus calls her and her race ‘dogs’ a typical form of abuse used against non-Jews at the time. It’s quite shocking to hear these words from Jesus’ mouth.

What did Jesus see when he saw this woman? No doubt her look, her clothes, marked her out as being a Gentile and non-Jewish. At that time, he saw his role as going to the lost sheep of the house of Israel- she disrupted and challenged his understanding.

There are many current terms of abuse today for people of different race, ethnicity, culture, nationality, religion, gender, the list can go on.  We know that division along all sorts of lines operate with force and violent expression in our culture. And we know that they probably always have. Humans break off into tribes and mark themselves out by specific forms of clothing and behavior.

What happens to Jesus when he is confronted by someone who dares to believe that God is different?

‘Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children’s food.’

Jesus changes. He is changed by her words, by her refusal to be pushed aside because she’s not the right religion, or the right race. He sees her differently and responds to her faith- in the goodness and impartiality of God:

‘For saying that, you may go, the demon has left your daughter’.

The recent debate about women wearing the burqa should be put in dialogue with the story of Rahila and the story of the nameless Syrophoenician woman.

What are they telling us? What can we learn from them?

It seems to me that they demand we take them seriously: ‘I call. You’re stone’ is the articulation of people who are ignored, whose existence is so denigrated and denied, that disappearance and invisibility become inevitable.

One day you’ll look and find I’m gone.

It could be that the absence is a positive one; a woman with courage claims her freedom and strikes out for it. Or, it could be tragic, as neglect, possession and control end up by destroying. But absence is their only form of protest.

The boundaries and barriers which keep us all locked inside our own prejudices and hatreds are there to be broken down. The women in both our stories are defiant and brave: Rahila knew of control and subjection but she also knew about the freedom of self-expression. In taking her own life she expressed her rejection of male violence and control. The Syrophoenician woman trusted that God could heal, and she claimed that healing for her daughter.

The demonic (from which the girl in the Bible story is delivered) seeks to control others, to subject and ultimately destroy them (we must forget the idea of little black creatures running around menacingly!). There are al sorts of ways in which we individually and corporately are controlled by the demonic. Rahila knew that her brothers wanted to control her and were willing to see her destroyed if she disobeyed. She set herself free from the demonic culture to which she was subjected, the only way that she could, by taking her own life.

Jesus realized that his powers of healing were not to be seen narrowly and only from within the context of his birth religion. He was challenged to be bolder with his gifts. The opening out of Christianity as a religion for all people’s, embracing and transforming all cultures, is essential to its message.  

Perhaps the connecting healing story in our Gospel ( Mark 7: 31-37) is instructive, for in it the man literally has his ears opened; might this be a metaphor for the ways in which we all refuse to hear and need to have our ears opened? We need God to open our ears so that we learn to speak ‘plainly’, i.e. the truth.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further reading: 'I am a beggar of the world. Landay poetry from contemporary Afghanistan'. Photos, Seamus Murphy and translation by Eliza Grinwold. 

A Splash of Poetry, Mark Oakley.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Radical Story-telling?

Public Domain   The Flight into Egypt  File: Adam Elsheimer - Die Flucht nach Ägypten (Alte Pinakothek) 2.jpg Created: 31 December 1608 Which of the Gospel writers include an account of the birth of Jesus? When were they writing, for what audience? Mark’s Gospel is almost universally considered to be the earliest Gospel and it’s understood that both Matthew and Luke used it as a source text. But Mark has no account of the birth of Jesus, he begins with John the Baptist and Jesus’ baptism. Only Matthew and Luke have birth narratives and they are different whilst sharing some common features: Mary and Joseph are to be married and there’s a miraculous virgin birth in Bethlehem. But that’s about it. Jesus is born in a house in Matthew’s account whilst he is placed in a manger in Luke’s because there’s ‘no room at the inn’. Mary’s thoughts and feelings are not mentioned in Matthew at all, whilst from Luke we get the story of the Visitation, Annunciation and the wonderfu...

Rugby

It has been just over three weeks now since we have arrived in Rugby and it feels like a world away from South London. If I was used to being in what is generally thought of and written about as a post-Christian secular world then Rugby looks and feels very different. There are a proliferation of churches across Rugby which are very active in working together for the good of the town. There seems to be a genuine Spirit of God's love working across Rugby in impressive ways that I'm not sure what century I am in! It is surprising to find a town that works so hard in regenerating and reinvigorating all that it is and it feels like an enormous privilege to be here.  Not that South London was any kind of spiritual desert! It was also a great privilege to work there and see how God can still be so central to people's lives in the 21st century. If the image we get from the newspapers and national media is that God is redundant in the modern age it seems that the reality is very ...

War and Religion

St Paul is a man who experienced a seismic shift in his understanding of how God relates to His people and to him as an individual.  That shift in thinking is dramatised in the road to Damascus episode, which as a story has become synonymous with the experience of dramatic conversion. Paul provides us with a paradigmatic example of the effects of conversion on an individual. His passion for and evangelical zeal for his new found understanding is second to none. Yet with the advantage of hindsight we know that the division between Judaism and Christianity has led to some pretty awful consequences. Paul’s continuing comparison between what he used to believe and what he now believes necessarily casts the Jewish comprehension in an unfavourable light. So much of Christian history has been about casting the Jewish faith as one that has been superseded by the superior Christian one. What can we do about this? We can’t read Paul’s words innocently after the holocaust and we can’t speak...