Skip to main content

Conversion in today’s world?


References: Romans 8:1-11; Isaiah 55:10-13; Psalm 77



St Paul has a thoroughly religious understanding of the world, so even though his dramatic ‘Damascus Road’ conversion has become paradigmatic of the conversion journey, his conversion was from one understanding of salvation to another understanding. It was a movement within monotheism.

·         His movement through Judaism to Christianity is a movement from within one religious framework to another religious framework, one that shares a common heritage and language

English society does not operate from a shared religious framework anymore:

·         It has the memory of one, but the language, themes and concepts have been generally rejected, not just forgotten
·         to move into one again would involve a radical departure from the current arc of history

Paul’s struggles as evidenced in our passage from the Letter to the Romans reveal some of the reasons why Christianity and religious understanding more generally have been superseded by secularism, humanism, agnosticism, atheism and even a return to paganism.

People today are the product of a journey through which people came to realise and/or reject:
  1.                       a God that condemns and punishes
  2.              a church that wields the power to control, condemn and exclude 
  3.                       a God that has the moral capacity and intention to condemn humans to eternal suffering
  4.                       the body and the flesh as inherently bad or to be fought against


The reasons above are clearly ones that inform the secular society we inhabit, whether they adequately reflect the orthodox faith or not is a different matter.

If we are to see our society move from an overwhelmingly secular framework to one in which at least a religious framework is better understood and even adopted by a wider variety of people, we have a huge task ahead of us. It involves much more of a conversion than St Paul experienced on the road to Damascus.

The only reason we should or could invite people to frame their lives religiously again is because only God is good and God gives good things to his people/creation. What do those good things look like, how can we evidence them in our lives? 

‘I will recall to the mind the deeds of the Lord;
I will remember your wonders of old.
I will meditate on all your work,
And muse on your mighty deeds.’  (Psalm 77)

The urgent task we have as a church is to recall to mind the gracious deeds of the Lord; the wonders he has done from of old; and to meditate together on his mighty work. For the Jewish community the remembrance of God’s saving acts are the content and practice of their faith and it is a community, not a private or personal exercise.

What reason do we have to praise God? What wonders has he done in our lives?

o   If we cannot find any reason to praise God, we have no good news to share
o   If we cannot show that believing in God makes a real difference in our lives and in our communities, we have no good news to share
o   If we have no good news to share, we are silent and dumb like the idols that cannot speak

But God’s word:

goes out from my mouth; and it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose, and succeed in the thing for which I sent it
(Isaiah 55:11)

We know from Scripture that God’s word performs and enacts real and positive change. We can have confidence in the power of God’s word. So, if God’s word is not accomplishing anything in us or in our community it is not God’s word at work in us.  History has rejected a God that doesn’t exist and a church that has failed to communicate God in a way that is attractive and authentic.

What or who is God?

We know from Scripture and from Jesus’ life that God is:

slow to anger, merciful and kind, loving and humble, full of compassion, shouting out for justice, defending the poor and needy, welcoming the stranger, a community, child-like, vulnerable, free.

Each of us is called to be the same, to grow in Christ-likeness; together we are the church, so if we are Christ-like the church will be Christ-like. Then we will be going someway to building a religious framework that people can have confidence in, countering the one that has already been rejected: rather than a God that condemns and punishes, one that creates and blesses; rather that a church that wields the power to control, condemn and exclude, a church that humbles itself, cherishes, nurtures and welcomes; rather than a God that has the moral capacity and intention to condemn humans to eternal suffering, one that invites them into eternal life; and rather than seeing the body and the flesh as inherently bad or to be fought against, seeing all that is created as blessed and sanctified. These are the messages that our culture must hear if it is to begin to listen even a little to the voices of faith.



Picture: https://www.flickr.com/photos/frted/5512468571
'St Paul on road to Damascus' by Ted, 2011  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Radical Story-telling?

Public Domain   The Flight into Egypt  File: Adam Elsheimer - Die Flucht nach Ägypten (Alte Pinakothek) 2.jpg Created: 31 December 1608 Which of the Gospel writers include an account of the birth of Jesus? When were they writing, for what audience? Mark’s Gospel is almost universally considered to be the earliest Gospel and it’s understood that both Matthew and Luke used it as a source text. But Mark has no account of the birth of Jesus, he begins with John the Baptist and Jesus’ baptism. Only Matthew and Luke have birth narratives and they are different whilst sharing some common features: Mary and Joseph are to be married and there’s a miraculous virgin birth in Bethlehem. But that’s about it. Jesus is born in a house in Matthew’s account whilst he is placed in a manger in Luke’s because there’s ‘no room at the inn’. Mary’s thoughts and feelings are not mentioned in Matthew at all, whilst from Luke we get the story of the Visitation, Annunciation and the wonderful radical

Silence

Lent Study Group One of my top 10 books of the last 10 years has to be: 'A Book of Silence' by Sara Maitland. I first heard Sara talk at Greenbelt many years ago and I was fascinated then by who she was - an eccentric woman, speaking with intensity and insight, offering an alternative and captivating viewpoint on the human experience. In this book she explores silence in all sorts of ways: by living on her own; by visiting the desert; through analysing the desert traditions within early Christianity; and through attending to what happens to the body and the mind in and through extended silence and isolation. Her book begins: I am sitting on the front doorstep of my little house with a cup of coffee, looking down the valley at my extraordinary view of nothing. It is wonderful. Virginia Woolf famously taught us that every woman writer needs a room of her own. She didn't know the half of it, in my opinion. I need a moor of my own. Or, as an exasperated but obvious

Invited by God

Anyone who seeks to say that God exists and that they have something to say about God, or even for God, is walking a very fine line between insanity and megalomania: religions have fallen foul to both and still do. With that in mind, how can I stand before you as a priest, a person who is meant to be a sign of God in the world? Am I mad or a psychopath? And yet I stand here, and you are here too...... The most important thing I can say to you, is that I do, because of a sense that life is a mystery. That mystery of my existence and of yours isn’t easily located in all the other narratives that I hear and have heard through my life, about creation, purpose and meaning, or lack of it. Science and humanism offer us much, but not that.  There’s a mystery at the heart of me that’s profoundly invitational – by which I mean, it invites me to believe that my existence isn’t just a matter of flesh and blood.  And this mystery can be explored through the medium of poetry, ar