Skip to main content

Truth that Divides


'Do you think I have come to bring peace to the earth?'


Jeremiah 23.23-29
Luke 12:49-56

As Christians we live with paradox – we believe after all in God made man; perhaps the greatest example of a paradox that there is. Jesus talks in our passage from Luke about bringing division – which seems highly paradoxical, as isn’t he the Prince of Peace? Why would Jesus come to divide households, mothers against daughters and fathers against sons? Surely, we can’t worship a God who proclaims such a message?
The reason that Jesus brings division, and that he is labouring to see it completed (‘what stress I am under until it is completed’) is because the Word of God is not neutral, bland or irrelevant. As the Living Word our response to Jesus can’t be neutral or bland either.

The Word of God is, as the prophet Jeremiah says:

‘like fire and like a hammer that breaks rocks in pieces’

Or,

‘The Word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing until it divides soul from spirit, joints from marrow; it is able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart’ (Hebrews 4.12).

It’s impossible to be neutral or unmoved as a Christian in the face of suffering, in the face of injustice: ‘Defend the right of the humble and needy; rescue the weak and the poor, deliver them from the hand of the wicked’ says the psalmist.


If our wealth and our privilege shield us from the real and damaging realities of inequality – poverty that manifests itself most fully in lack of choice, absence of opportunity, then we can become bland Christians whose faith means nothing other than respectability. People who shuffle in pews, bow heads and refuse to have their hearts transformed by the overpowering love and compassion of God.

Jesus comes to shake all that up. He labours under a baptism that is waiting for fulfilment. He has not come to preach peace but division. Where do you stand? Make a choice! Be somebody who stands up for the vulnerable, the weak, the poor. Be somebody who speaks truth publicly and not lies.


We live in a culture where permissiveness has been the strong and dominant ethical narrative for some time: what is good is what makes you happy, the right thing for you. And there are some real benefits to that way of living – shame becomes less dominant in such a culture, for instance. It seems like we are in a place of freedom. But, perhaps the flipside of that is that truth as a concept and reality is undermined, as each person has their own truth. Without a common understanding of truth, we come to a place where we can’t trust each other and then we see society start to fracture with the widespread telling of lies.

That is not the Christian narrative, the Christian narrative says that we live in a world created and loved by God, who is the source of all truth, light, life and goodness. That there is a difference between right and wrong, between good and bad, between lies and the truth. That we can trust in God to teach us what is true, to help us live in communities of justice and peace. Jesus is the manifestation of God in our world- and we are called to follow him and to put all our trust in Him.

Jesus brings through his life and witness a truth that divides people. He demands a response, either of commitment or rejection. We cannot stand neutral in front of his Word.










Comments

Post a Comment

Please be respectful when posting comments

Popular posts from this blog

Radical Story-telling?

Public Domain   The Flight into Egypt  File: Adam Elsheimer - Die Flucht nach Ägypten (Alte Pinakothek) 2.jpg Created: 31 December 1608 Which of the Gospel writers include an account of the birth of Jesus? When were they writing, for what audience? Mark’s Gospel is almost universally considered to be the earliest Gospel and it’s understood that both Matthew and Luke used it as a source text. But Mark has no account of the birth of Jesus, he begins with John the Baptist and Jesus’ baptism. Only Matthew and Luke have birth narratives and they are different whilst sharing some common features: Mary and Joseph are to be married and there’s a miraculous virgin birth in Bethlehem. But that’s about it. Jesus is born in a house in Matthew’s account whilst he is placed in a manger in Luke’s because there’s ‘no room at the inn’. Mary’s thoughts and feelings are not mentioned in Matthew at all, whilst from Luke we get the story of the Visitation, Annunciation and the wonderfu...
2 comments
Read more

Rugby

It has been just over three weeks now since we have arrived in Rugby and it feels like a world away from South London. If I was used to being in what is generally thought of and written about as a post-Christian secular world then Rugby looks and feels very different. There are a proliferation of churches across Rugby which are very active in working together for the good of the town. There seems to be a genuine Spirit of God's love working across Rugby in impressive ways that I'm not sure what century I am in! It is surprising to find a town that works so hard in regenerating and reinvigorating all that it is and it feels like an enormous privilege to be here.  Not that South London was any kind of spiritual desert! It was also a great privilege to work there and see how God can still be so central to people's lives in the 21st century. If the image we get from the newspapers and national media is that God is redundant in the modern age it seems that the reality is very ...
Post a Comment
Read more

War and Religion

St Paul is a man who experienced a seismic shift in his understanding of how God relates to His people and to him as an individual.  That shift in thinking is dramatised in the road to Damascus episode, which as a story has become synonymous with the experience of dramatic conversion. Paul provides us with a paradigmatic example of the effects of conversion on an individual. His passion for and evangelical zeal for his new found understanding is second to none. Yet with the advantage of hindsight we know that the division between Judaism and Christianity has led to some pretty awful consequences. Paul’s continuing comparison between what he used to believe and what he now believes necessarily casts the Jewish comprehension in an unfavourable light. So much of Christian history has been about casting the Jewish faith as one that has been superseded by the superior Christian one. What can we do about this? We can’t read Paul’s words innocently after the holocaust and we can’t speak...
Post a Comment
Read more