Skip to main content

Reflections for Advent: It is only an absent God that requires faith.

God’s absence is part of our common, in fact normal experience: ‘O that you would tear open the heavens and come down!’  – O that you would demonstrate your power; make your reality known in a way that we cannot ignore. Because we forget you, we misbehave, we ignore you, because you do not impose yourselves on us! (Isaiah, 64.1-9). It is perhaps this experience of absence that makes most people assume that belief in God is foolish, contrary to experience. But, an evident, loud, noisy God, going around demonstrating Her power, would be one that impinges on the freedom we have been given in creation. God has given us self-determination and freedom. Faithfulness is about living hopefully with the seeming absence of God and the silence of God. It is about living as though God were with us all the time, watching us and guiding us.

Remembering a God who is silent, inconspicuous and gentle is the spiritual discipline supreme.

It is only an absent God that requires faith.

For it is our daily remembrance, we might say prayer, that makes us people of faith.

If we forget God, we are faithless. If we remember him, he changes us.

So, when we talk about prayer or worship, or being with others of faith, what we are saying is, do you make time to remember that you believe in God? For it is only the practice of faith that makes it real. He has given us many signs and ways to fine Him if we look: 'seek and ye shall find'. God is there, but we have to start looking. 

The ‘daily examen’, a spiritual discipline of St Ignatius Loyola, which has received much renewed interest as a spiritual pathway, is about actively looking for God. It requires a person to review the day that has passed looking for signs of God's presence and absence. A life of faith is nothing more or less, but the practice of the presence of God.

How would we live, how would we change our behaviour if we believed in God’s presence, if we really thought God was in the room? The act of faith requires an imaginative leap between our experience of absence, death and decay into hope, joy, rebirth, regeneration; between our experiences of the often harsh realities of our existence and the journey into an alternative understanding of human destiny. Then we start to live, meaning we change our behaviour and our attitude, based on that faith. Intentional daily awareness of God’s presence will transform us. We might start helping at the soup kitchen, we might start giving more to charity, we might temper our anger that’s often betrayed us, and we might make more of an effort with someone that’s always threatened or annoyed us. Small tiny steps, small changes in our reality, small things built upon the practice of remembering God.

That is what we are asked to do in the season of Advent, to wake up to God in our lives, to attune ourselves anew to the melody of God. Wake Up! Be alert!

Advent is a season about expecting God’s presence; not only in the past and not only in the future, but also and most importantly in our present. We wait to celebrate the Incarnation – God’s presence with his people and we look forward to the future presence of God, in the second coming, but we invite God’s indwelling with us now. We open ourselves to his invitation.

And when we do, we may experience the noisy God. The God that through our discipline of patient remembering, starts to trust that he can make himself known to us. The absent silent God becomes the ever-present imminent God; we see God in everyone and everything. But importantly that transformation has not come about by God coming down making the water quake and the earth tremble, but through our faithfulness. We have to make that journey where we are transformed inside out, where our faith is really a part of us. Imposed, authoritarian faith is blind; indwelt, experienced faith is full of sight. And, wow, just wait and see what God lets you see!



Comments

Post a Comment

Please be respectful when posting comments

Popular posts from this blog

Identity, belonging and holiness

Sermon for 2nd July Doubting Thomas - Ephesians 2:19-end, John 20:24-29 In Paul’s letter to the Ephesians we see classic Pauline theology in action – Paul is explaining to the Ephesians (Gentiles) that they are fully accepted into the household of God and full members of it. The implication is that they are unsure about their place. Paul is clear that their tradition and history is rooted now not only in the Patriarchs, but also in the Apostles and with Jesus Christ as the corner stone. It is the Apostles in Jesus who invite them to full membership. No longer is holiness and worship centred on the Temple in Jerusalem but, rather, the individual believers are spiritual temples and the group of believers an ‘habitation of God’. Paul, as we know, had been fully committed to his identity as a God-fearing Jew; his life and ritual practice confirmed his sense of superior identity before God. He was saved because of his birth right and due to his strict adherence to the Law. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Radical Story-telling?

Public Domain   The Flight into Egypt  File: Adam Elsheimer - Die Flucht nach Ägypten (Alte Pinakothek) 2.jpg Created: 31 December 1608 Which of the Gospel writers include an account of the birth of Jesus? When were they writing, for what audience? Mark’s Gospel is almost universally considered to be the earliest Gospel and it’s understood that both Matthew and Luke used it as a source text. But Mark has no account of the birth of Jesus, he begins with John the Baptist and Jesus’ baptism. Only Matthew and Luke have birth narratives and they are different whilst sharing some common features: Mary and Joseph are to be married and there’s a miraculous virgin birth in Bethlehem. But that’s about it. Jesus is born in a house in Matthew’s account whilst he is placed in a manger in Luke’s because there’s ‘no room at the inn’. Mary’s thoughts and feelings are not mentioned in Matthew at all, whilst from Luke we get the story of the Visitation, Annunciation and the wonderfu...
2 comments
Read more

Wonga and the Archbishop.

The Archbishop’s embarrassment concerning the Church Commissioner’s investment indirectly in Wonga helps to clarify ideas about sin, purity and holiness. In particular it reveals the extent to which sin is communal and interconnected. The Archbishop talks about a complex world which we all have to live in. He is right, but it can be put more theologically than that. The in-depth discussion around the Charity Commissioner’s investment portfolio and its tolerance of say up to 3% in companies (perhaps a hotel chain) that sell pornography reveals the way in which it is probably impossible to exist in perfect holy isolation. Nobody is perfect in and of themselves because we exist inter-dependently of one another. That is why sin is so corrupting - the wide effect of the pornographic industry not just on those who make it and buy it can be charted. That is why, when God made Himself known to the Jewish people as YHWH, that he started a covenantal relationship not just with a few individuals ...
Read more